1
Where are you now:
Homepage
/

2006

  • Categories:Bta course
  • Author:
  • Origin:
  • Time of issue:2021-12-15 14:19
  • Views:

(Summary description)On March 17, the China Trademark Association and BTA Intellectual Property Agency Co., Ltd. jointly put forward the written opinions of the third party to the EU internal market Coordination Bureau in accordance with Article 41 of the trademark regulations of the European Community in the name of a third party, and revoked the two trademarks of EU No. 004631305 No. 004631966 "not made in China".<br />
In May, BTA Intellectual Property Agency Co., Ltd. sent staff to Toronto, Canada to attend the 128th international trademark annual conference of INTA.<br />
On September 11, the EU internal market Coordination Bureau issued a notice of decisive rejection to Alberto company, and finally rejected the trademark registration application on the ground that "trademarks violating public order and good customs shall not be registered".<br />

2006

(Summary description)On March 17, the China Trademark Association and BTA Intellectual Property Agency Co., Ltd. jointly put forward the written opinions of the third party to the EU internal market Coordination Bureau in accordance with Article 41 of the trademark regulations of the European Community in the name of a third party, and revoked the two trademarks of EU No. 004631305 No. 004631966 "not made in China".<br />
In May, BTA Intellectual Property Agency Co., Ltd. sent staff to Toronto, Canada to attend the 128th international trademark annual conference of INTA.<br />
On September 11, the EU internal market Coordination Bureau issued a notice of decisive rejection to Alberto company, and finally rejected the trademark registration application on the ground that "trademarks violating public order and good customs shall not be registered".<br />

  • Categories:Bta course
  • Author:
  • Origin:
  • Time of issue:2021-12-15 14:19
  • Views:
Information

  On March 17, the China Trademark Association and BTA Intellectual Property Agency Co., Ltd. jointly put forward the written opinions of the third party to the EU internal market Coordination Bureau in accordance with Article 41 of the trademark regulations of the European Community in the name of a third party, and revoked the two trademarks of EU No. 004631305 No. 004631966 "not made in China".

  In May, BTA Intellectual Property Agency Co., Ltd. sent staff to Toronto, Canada to attend the 128th international trademark annual conference of INTA.

  On September 11, the EU internal market Coordination Bureau issued a notice of decisive rejection to Alberto company, and finally rejected the trademark registration application on the ground that "trademarks violating public order and good customs shall not be registered".

Scan the QR code to read on your phone

Previous: 2007
Next: 2005
Previous: 2007
Next: 2005
Release of typical cases of intellectual property administrative protection in 2020

Release of typical cases of intellectual property administrative protection in 2020

InordertothoroughlyimplementthedecisionanddeploymentoftheCPCCentralCommitteeandtheStateCouncilonComprehensivelyStrengtheningIntellectualPropertyProtection,guideandimprovethequalityandefficiencyofhandlingcases,effectivelydeterintellectualpropertyviolations,andactivelycreateagoodbusinessenvironment,duringtheNationalIntellectualPropertyPublicityWeekin2021,theStateIntellectualPropertyofficeissuedtypicalcasesofintellectualpropertyadministrativeprotectionin2020.  Aftercaseselection,onlinevotingandexpertreview,theStateIntellectualPropertyOfficefinallyselectedthetoptentypicalcasesofpatentadministrativeprotectionandtoptentypicalcasesoftrademarkadministrativeprotectionin2020.Amongthem,patentcasescoverthreetypesofpatents:invention,utilitymodelanddesign.Thetypesofcasesinvolveadministrativeadjudicationofpatentinfringementdisputes,investigationandhandlingofcounterfeitpatents,andmediationofdisputesoverpatentownershipandinventorqualification;Trademarkcasescovercommoditytrademarks,servicetrademarksandcollectivetrademarksofgeographicalindications.Thetypesofcasesinvolveinvestigatinganddealingwithillegalactssuchastrademarkinfringementandcounterfeiting,generalviolationsoftrademarksandinfringementofwell-knowntrademarks.Thesetypicalcasesarehighlyrepresentative,concernedandinfluential,showingtheachievementsChinahasmadeincomprehensivelystrengtheningintellectualpropertyprotection,givingfullplaytotheadvantagesofadministrativeprotection,effectivelydeterringillegalacts,continuouslyoptimizinginnovationandbusinessenvironmentinrecentyears.  Amongthetoptentypicalcasesannounced,the"Maiji"caseistheagencyofBTAGuangzhoucompany.Thiscaseisatypicalcaseoftrademarkintellectualpropertyprotectionin2020bytheStateAdministrationofmarketsupervision,thetoptentypicalcasesoftheStateIntellectualPropertyBureau,andthetoptentypicalcasesofcrossjudicialadministrativearbitrationandmediationofintellectualpropertyprotectioninGuangzhou.  https://www.cnipa.gov.cn/art/2021/4/27/art_2585_158895.html
发布时间 : 2021-04-28 点击 : 0

© 2021 Copyright BTA Intellectual Property Agency Co., Ltd   京ICP备12040212号-1  Power by:300.cn Beijing