1
Where are you now:
Homepage
/

2006

  • Categories:Bta course
  • Author:
  • Origin:
  • Time of issue:2021-12-15 14:19
  • Views:

(Summary description)On March 17, the China Trademark Association and BTA Intellectual Property Agency Co., Ltd. jointly put forward the written opinions of the third party to the EU internal market Coordination Bureau in accordance with Article 41 of the trademark regulations of the European Community in the name of a third party, and revoked the two trademarks of EU No. 004631305 No. 004631966 "not made in China".<br />
In May, BTA Intellectual Property Agency Co., Ltd. sent staff to Toronto, Canada to attend the 128th international trademark annual conference of INTA.<br />
On September 11, the EU internal market Coordination Bureau issued a notice of decisive rejection to Alberto company, and finally rejected the trademark registration application on the ground that "trademarks violating public order and good customs shall not be registered".<br />

2006

(Summary description)On March 17, the China Trademark Association and BTA Intellectual Property Agency Co., Ltd. jointly put forward the written opinions of the third party to the EU internal market Coordination Bureau in accordance with Article 41 of the trademark regulations of the European Community in the name of a third party, and revoked the two trademarks of EU No. 004631305 No. 004631966 "not made in China".<br />
In May, BTA Intellectual Property Agency Co., Ltd. sent staff to Toronto, Canada to attend the 128th international trademark annual conference of INTA.<br />
On September 11, the EU internal market Coordination Bureau issued a notice of decisive rejection to Alberto company, and finally rejected the trademark registration application on the ground that "trademarks violating public order and good customs shall not be registered".<br />

  • Categories:Bta course
  • Author:
  • Origin:
  • Time of issue:2021-12-15 14:19
  • Views:
Information

  On March 17, the China Trademark Association and BTA Intellectual Property Agency Co., Ltd. jointly put forward the written opinions of the third party to the EU internal market Coordination Bureau in accordance with Article 41 of the trademark regulations of the European Community in the name of a third party, and revoked the two trademarks of EU No. 004631305 No. 004631966 "not made in China".

  In May, BTA Intellectual Property Agency Co., Ltd. sent staff to Toronto, Canada to attend the 128th international trademark annual conference of INTA.

  On September 11, the EU internal market Coordination Bureau issued a notice of decisive rejection to Alberto company, and finally rejected the trademark registration application on the ground that "trademarks violating public order and good customs shall not be registered".

Scan the QR code to read on your phone

Previous: 2007
Next: 2005
Previous: 2007
Next: 2005
Release of typical cases of intellectual property administrative protection in 2020

Release of typical cases of intellectual property administrative protection in 2020

In order to thoroughly implement the decision and deployment of the CPC Central Committee and the State Council on Comprehensively Strengthening Intellectual Property Protection, guide and improve the quality and efficiency of handling cases, effectively deter intellectual property violations, and actively create a good business environment, during the National Intellectual Property Publicity Week in 2021, the State Intellectual Property office issued typical cases of intellectual property administrative protection in 2020. After case selection, online voting and expert review, the State Intellectual Property Office finally selected the top ten typical cases of patent administrative protection and top ten typical cases of trademark administrative protection in 2020. Among them, patent cases cover three types of patents: invention, utility model and design. The types of cases involve administrative adjudication of patent infringement disputes, investigation and handling of counterfeit patents, and mediation of disputes over patent ownership and inventor qualification; Trademark cases cover commodity trademarks, service trademarks and collective trademarks of geographical indications. The types of cases involve investigating and dealing with illegal acts such as trademark infringement and counterfeiting, general violations of trademarks and infringement of well-known trademarks. These typical cases are highly representative, concerned and influential, showing the achievements China has made in comprehensively strengthening intellectual property protection, giving full play to the advantages of administrative protection, effectively deterring illegal acts, continuously optimizing innovation and business environment in recent years. Among the top ten typical cases announced, the "Maiji" case is the agency of Guangzhou Zhongbei company. This case is a typical case of trademark intellectual property protection in 2020 by the State Administration of market supervision, the top ten typical cases of the State Intellectual Property Bureau, and the top ten typical cases of cross judicial administrative arbitration and mediation of intellectual property protection in Guangzhou.
发布时间 : 2021-04-28 点击 : 0

© 2021 Copyright Zhongbei Intellectual Property Agency Co., Ltd   京ICP备12040212号-1  Power by:300.cn Beijing